Conversations with God


There are seasons when we can’t see what’s ahead, but we can still trust the One who walks with us and talks with us along the way. This is a conversation about uncertainty.

Me: I feel like I’m losing my grip on what I thought I believed. Doubt keeps creeping in.
God: Doubt isn’t the enemy you think it is.
Me: It feels like failure. Like I should be stronger by now.
God: Doubt is a sign you’re thinking, not that you’re drifting.
Me: But I worry it means I’m disappointing You.
God: You’re not. I’ve never asked you to pretend certainty you don’t have.
Me: Then why does it feel so heavy?
God: Because you’re trying to carry it alone, in silence.
Me: I don’t want to lose my faith.
God: You won’t. Faith isn’t the absence of doubt — it’s choosing to stay with Me even when the questions feel louder than the answers.
Me: Sometimes I wonder if I’m even allowed to ask the things I’m asking.
God: You are. I’ve heard every question from every heart since the beginning. None of yours scare Me.
Me: I just want to know You’re still here.
God: I am. Doubt doesn’t push Me away. It draws Me closer.
Me: So I don’t have to hide this?
God: No. Bring your doubt into the light. Let’s walk through it together.
Me: That feels gentler than I expected.
God: Good. Your questions do not threaten Me. I’m with you in them.

From Echo Chamber to Cannibalism: How Far-Left Purity Spirals Inward

 

My apologies for the length of my summary and comments, but this is a difficult one for me, requiring more than a cursory review, because I believe it explains why the Left will fail.

Turley criticizes a recent incident at Sarah Lawrence College and uses it to argue about campus intolerance and the “self-devouring” nature of extreme left-wing activism. New York Times columnist and podcast host Ezra Klein, a prominent liberal figure and critic of certain Israeli policies, appeared at the college for a “Building Bridges” event titled “In Conversation” with college president Cristle Collins Judd. The discussion focused on overcoming political polarization.

It failed. The polarization was very evident. Protesters, including members affiliated with Students for Justice in Palestine, disrupted the event by shouting accusations at Klein, labeling him a “genocide denier,” “Nazi normalizer,” “Zionist pig,” and complicit in alleged atrocities in Gaza. Even prior to the talk, campus graffiti and circulated images attacked him in similar terms, including on a free speech board and in a bathroom. Klein offered to debate, talk, and discuss. President Judd sat silently during the interruptions.

Turley portrays Sarah Lawrence as a far-left echo chamber that has long purged conservatives and libertarians from its faculty and administration. With no conservatives left to target, the “far left” turns inward on liberals like Klein, meaning he faced a heckler’s veto.

A couple of takeaways: Woke cancel culture is the very antithesis of “communicative rationality.” Cultural Marxism, much like its ideological ancestor Robespierre’s Jacobin Revolution, is planting the seeds of its self-destruction in its own version of Leftist Terror, just as Robespierre did back in 1793–1794, and Trump is their Napoleon. Interesting thought, and one I’ve mentioned before.

The Trump-as-Napoleon line fits this historical script: after revolutionary chaos and internal terror, a strongman figure, Napoleon, emerges to restore order, capitalizing on exhaustion with radicalism. In this view, overreach by the far left creates fertile ground for populist conservative reactions, as seen in some electoral shifts or cultural backlashes.

What happened to Klein demonstrates that cancel culture is absolute. There is a need for purity of message from top down; dissent is not allowed. Progressives brought this on themselves, hence the “Trump as Napoleon” analogy—a strong, populist figure who capitalizes on exhaustion brought on by extremism.

As the French say, the more things change, the more they stay the same; this captures the cyclical irony: revolutionary fervor promising liberation fails, whether in 1790s France or modern campus/political spheres.

Trump Account

My summary, but you have homework to do before opening one of these. I think I now understand why I’ve not seen much on this.

Trump Accounts are tax-advantaged investment accounts for U.S. children under 18, invested in low-cost S&P 500-style index funds and locked until age 18 to promote long-term compounding and generational wealth. The initial seed money from the government is $1,000 (for children born 2025–2028).

Parents/family/others can add up to $5,000 per year; employers up to $2,500 (counts toward the $5,000 total). Philanthropic and state pledges (e.g., $250 from the Dell Foundation for qualifying lower-income ZIP codes, $250 from Brad Gerstner for Indiana kids under 5, employer matches of $1,000 from companies like JPMorgan, BlackRock, etc.) can add extra seed money without counting toward the annual limit.

If only the $1,000 government seed is contributed and no other amounts are added, in eighteen years it would grow to about $5,800 using historical rates of return. If the other initial seed amounts are used (up to $2,500 in Indiana, for example), it would grow to over $14,000. If the initial amount is used with maximum additions from family/employer over the years, while it has to be speculative, it can grow to over $300,000. Remember, as the financial people say:estimates based on historical S&P 500 averages; past performance isn’t a guarantee.”

To fully understand it and maximize returns, visit https://trumpaccounts.gov/ and speak with a financial advisor. I’m not a financial advisor and the information here is in general, reasonable terms.

Article link:  Bessent: Trump Accounts May Be Trump’s ‘Most Enduring Legacy’

 

Touching the Face of God

I discovered today that I’ve never written about one of the more memorable events of my life, which took place 39 years ago.

The Challenger disaster was one of the most tragic events in the history of space exploration, occurring on January 28, 1986. I was home having lunch and watching television. The Space Shuttle Challenger exploded just 73 seconds after its launch from the Kennedy Space Center.

Seven crew members were onboard, including Christa McAuliffe, a teacher who was to be the first civilian in space as part of NASA’s “Teacher in Space” project. Among the other mission specialists were Ellison Onizuka, the first Asian American astronaut who had previously flown on the Discovery shuttle, and Judith Resnik, an electrical engineer from Ohio who was also the second American woman in space. Lastly, Gregory Jarvis, an engineer from Hughes Aircraft, was aboard as a payload specialist.

Also onboard was Commander Francis R. (Dick) Scobee, a veteran pilot with experience in both military and NASA test flights; Pilot Michael J. Smith, a former Navy captain who was on his first space mission; and Mission Specialist Ronald McNair, a physicist who was also the second African American in space.

The immediate cause of the explosion was the failure of an O-ring seal in one of the solid rocket boosters, which allowed pressurized hot gas to escape and burn through the external fuel tank, leading to the catastrophic breakup of the shuttle.

It was preventable—an O-ring failure due to the frigid temperatures on the morning of the launch. The night before, temperatures had dipped below freezing, which was well outside the operational specifications for the O-rings.

Engineers expressed concerns, but there was pressure to launch. A delay was significant because there had already been some delays, so the decision to launch was made.

The disaster led to the formation of the Rogers Commission to investigate the causes. The commission’s report was highly critical of NASA’s decision-making process, complacency about safety, emphasis on maintaining launch schedules, and poor communication between engineers and management broke down.

The report led to major changes in NASA’s management and safety protocols, including better communication practices and the eventual redesign of solid rocket boosters. However, all of this came too late for the crew that was lost.

The Challenger disaster had profound effects beyond the immediate loss of life and the technical failures. Public trust in NASA’s ability to manage space missions was undermined, and the space shuttle program shut down for nearly three years.

President Ronald Reagan’s response to the Challenger disaster was immediate. On the day of the tragedy, January 28, 1986, instead of delivering his scheduled State of the Union address, Reagan addressed the nation from the Oval Office.

He spoke of the tragedy in his speech, saying, “Ladies and gentlemen, I’d planned to speak to you tonight to report on the state of the Union, but the events of earlier today have led me to change those plans. Today is a day for mourning and remembering.” He acknowledged the national pain, highlighting the significance of the loss and the courage of the Challenger crew.

Reagan’s address was excellent. Borrowing from the poem, he concluded with the memorable line, “We will never forget them, nor the last time we saw them, this morning, as they prepared for their journey and waved goodbye. Borrowing from the poem, he concluded with the memorable line, “‘slipped the surly bonds of earth’ to ‘touch the face of God.'” This speech is remembered for its eloquence and emotions, offering empathy and solace to the public and honoring the memory of those lost.

Three days later, Reagan delivered another address at a memorial service in Houston, where he again spoke of national mourning and the personal loss felt by the families of the crew. He praised the astronauts for their dedication and service, saying, “They had a hunger to explore the universe and discover its truths. They wished to serve, and they did. They served all of us.” For me, though, I go back to these as the most moving:

“We will never forget them, nor the last time we saw them, this morning, as they prepared for their journey and waved goodbye and ‘slipped the surly bonds of earth’ to ‘touch the face of God.'”

Sunday Reflection


Inspirational Bible verse from 1 Peter 3:14 KJV about courage and faith.Most of us are not in the middle of what is happening in Minneapolis. We are watching from a distance and trying to stay steady while the world is tense and divided.

When everything shakes, God calls His people to stand firm.

“Be not afraid of their terror, neither be troubled.” 1 Peter 3:14 KJV

Fear does not have to rule your heart. And in moments like this, your prayers matter more than you know. Turn it overto God, and trust Him to work where we cannot.

And pray for the officers who feel hated or targeted, so they may do their jobs without being demoralized, because we know they carry the weight of responsibility and the fear of misinterpretation.

Pray, too, for those who feel unheard or mistreated, that God will open their eyes and move them away from evil; that they will see they are being used for sacrifice by others.