Towers That Cannot Reach the Uncreated Light

Marxism as a “secular religion,” trying to build heaven on earth by political means, and in the charge that collectivist systems invert the first commandment; they put a human construct in the place reserved for the Creator. Marx’s own language about abolishing religion and the family is often cited as evidence that the project was never meant to coexist with a transcendent God.

The DSA rejects this interpretation, arguing that caring for the poor and restructuring economic power is fidelity to God, not competition with God.  It is about whether a political program that claims comprehensive authority over how society should be ordered is, in practice, trying to occupy the role of God.

So, God is uncreated, self-existent, and the source of being itself. But no political movement, state, or collective can step into that position no matter how comprehensive its claims. When an ideology treats its program as the final authority on justice, meaning, and the shape of human life, it does not become God, it simply produces a counterfeit that cannot deliver what it promises. The result, in this view, is coercion justified as liberation, and disappointment when the promised transformation of human nature does not occur.

Think of it as a glass city rising on cracked ground. It looks impressive though unfinished, with banners of a new world already flying. But the towers cannot reach the uncreated light in the open sky, or the unshaken horizon beyond them. The city remains a human work. The light does not.

The Bible repeatedly warns against exactly this pattern: human power or human projects claiming the place that belongs only to God, promising a completed world by their own means, and demanding the loyalty that belongs to the Creator.

Let’s examine one familiar to all found in The Ten Commandments, the first of which says, “You shall have no other gods before me” (Exodus 20:3). Anything treated as ultimate, whether nation, king, system, or ideology, is an idol. The Bible warns the absurdity of worshiping what human hands have made. The charge is not that the idol succeeds in becoming God; it is that people act as if it has. Beware those people and systems.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *